Showing posts with label masculinity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label masculinity. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Ron Swanson is a Man



on pop theology, philosophy, theology, culture, pop culture, christianityby Ben Howard

There is a man in this world.

A man who knows what he likes.

A man who likes dark haired women and breakfast foods.

A man who understands that fish is basically a vegetable.

That man is Ron Swanson.

In case you don’t know, and judging from the ratings you don’t, Ron Swanson is one of the main characters on the critically acclaimed sitcom Parks and Recreation.

Ron (played by Nick Offerman) is an incredibly interesting character in modern television because Ron is a successful male character who is neither a jerk nor an immature man-boy (think Barney from How I Met Your Mother or J.D. from Scrubs).

Instead, Ron is a dedicated libertarian who likes hunting and fishing and drinking whiskey. He has a wood shop where he makes harps and canoes. He likes meat served with a side of meat that you eat while watching a war movie. To borrow a quote from man-boy Nick on the rival sitcom New Girl, Ron Swanson probably smells like, “strong coffee and going to see a man about a horse.”

Recently, I’ve taken a special interest in depictions of masculinity in our culture. I’m 25 and find myself in that awkward transition from college-age quasi-adulthood to actual adulthood where I’m responsible, things matter, and I have to figure out where to buy a lamp or how to register a car with the DMV. One of the questions I've found myself asking during this transition is what exactly it means to be a "man" in my cultural context.

Is the definition of a man the stereotypical stoic father who knows how to fix cars and intimidate people with his stare? Is it a lawyer or a stockbroker? Is it a soldier? Warrior? Fighter? A new-age sensitive soul who knows when someone needs a hug?

Is it more important for a man to know how to shoot a gun or say, "I love you"? Do I need to know how to fix a water heater or plant a garden?

See, the fun of a character like Ron Swanson is that he lives by the code, "Be a man" as if it is really that simple. However, on closer inspection, it's a very specific definition of that gender role and one that is offset by all of the other "men" who are part of the cast. Are they less manly because they don't live up to Ron's lofty heights of manliness?

This is a topic I'm going to be exploring for awhile, and I'm open to any suggestions, conversations, advice, or anything else that might further the discussion. I really do want to know what you think about this issue, so comment, tweet to me, send me an email, call me, or just talk to me when you see me in person. I think this is an important conversation to have and I hope you'll join me.

Peace,
Ben

When he isn't trying to undercover the meaning of being a man, Ben likes to skip through meadows and feel the wind in his hair. Ahhh. You can follow him on Twitter @BenHoward87 or email him at benjamin.howard87 [at] gmail.com.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Quick Thoughts on Back to the Future

on pop theology, philosophy, theology, culture, pop culture, christianity
by Ben Howard

So far everything written on this site has been structured like a long form essay.  Those take some time to craft and write, so I wanted to try a few quick thoughts posts from our two most recent Movie Nights.  First, Back to the Future, and hopefully later today, Les Miserables.


Back to the Future places a heavy emphasis on the belief that your present life is eventually at the mercy of your past.  The person you were will eventually become the person you are.  The McFly’s, Doc Brown, and Biff are all the same characters they were in high school.  The only way for the McFly’s family life to improve is a change in the past because in the future they are locked into a life of lower-middle class despair and angst. 

This is really opposed to the Christian notion of an active God and redeemer.  The idea of redemption and the capactity for growth assume the ability to develop and change over time.  Essentially, they assume that, with the Spirit, we are not forever the person we are at any one time.  The movie even makes a somewhat similar point when Marty, an outside agent, forces George to confront his fears, thus enabling him to be the kind of man who becomes “successful” as seen in the return to 1985 at the end of the film.

Other topics of interest:
-Masculinity and bullying in the relationship between George and Biff.  George has to punch Biff to assert himself as the dominant male.

-Stories we tell ourselves and their relative truth. Lorraine tells Marty that she was never “that kind of girl”, but we learn that in the past she truly is.  Why do you avoid telling the truth about who we are/were?

-Success is based on power and monetary wealth.  Marty’s family is portrayed as poor and sad, but then when they are rich and successful later, they are happy.  The assumption is that “good” people overcome their obstacles and become successful.

-The myth of the idyllic society.  The 1950’s are presented as sparkling and clean, but there is the same violence, the same dark motivations, and the same problems as in 1985, only under a shiny veneer.

Peace,
Ben