Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts

Friday, July 18, 2014

Elephants in the Room: Israel, Palestine, and the Nature of Oppression

by David Creech

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.”

Bishop Desmond Tutu

My natural disposition is to side with those who are oppressed. I also prefer to hear people tell their own story rather than insert my opinions from the outside. Enter the Israel-Palestine conflict.

This longstanding (Western-created) conflict reentered my thinking in late June when the Presbyterian Church (USA) very narrowly voted to divest from U.S. companies that benefit from the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. This decision was given much more attention than their equally significant (and overwhelmingly supported) decision to allow a process for gay marriage. (Quick aside: the relative silence about this decision in popular media suggests to me that, as a society, we are done with this conversation. Support of gay marriage remains an issue only in certain conservative communities. Move along, people.) The resolution was criticized by many Jewish and pro-Israel groups as tone deaf at best and anti-Semitic at worst.

*pause for deep breath*

And yet, the recent events leading up to and culminating in Israel’s so-called “Operation Protective Edge” demonstrate why the Presbyterian decision may be warranted. At the time of this writing (a running tally of the deaths is available here), Israel has launched more than 1,300 rockets into the Palestinian territories, killing at least 222 Palestinians (approximately 77% of whom are civilians) and injuring nearly 1,700 more. This in response to three Israeli teens who were (quite wrongfully) killed by Palestinian extremists. As one Palestinian advocate on Twitter put it, if a toddler bites the neighborhood bully and the bully retaliates with an axe, one is justifiably angrier about the axe.

To choose neutrality in this conflict is to side with the elephant.

Except… this is where it gets tricky. Historically, Jews have been oppressed by Christians. This previously referenced article gives a helpful history. And though the oppression spans centuries, one needn’t look far beyond Christianity’s primary documents to see the horror of anti-Semitism in its very foundations. (Quick qualifying statement: perceived anti-Semitism in the New Testament is in some ways anachronistic—the authors were members of a Jewish sect engaged in an intramural conflict.) Paul calls Jews children of a slave woman. The Gospel of Matthew unequivocally blames the Jewish people for Jesus’ death. The Gospel of John calls the Jews children of Satan. Statements such as these (and many more could be adduced) led to a horrible history of disenfranchisement, ghettoization, pogroms, and ultimately the Holocaust.

Jews are right to feel like the mouse whose tail is being crushed by an elephant.

In this context, it is fair to ask why the state of Israel was singled out by the PC(USA) for sanctions. There are a host of unjust regimes around the world, many of whom are far more vicious and cruel (Egypt, anyone?). It is also fair to ask why this conflict captures my attention and elicits more rage than those far more devastating wars in Syria and Iraq. What latent anti-Semitism may be operative in this focus on Israel?

Perhaps the PC(USA) had no holdings to divest themselves of with regard to first-tier actors in the other brutal conflicts that are unfolding.  And perhaps it was some rhetorical break with the odd pairing of American Christianity and the state of Israel that grew from a peculiar eschatology. And certainly Israel’s actions rightly cause outrage and anger. But how do we speak to this injustice when we are part of a much larger and longer history of discrimination and violence, when that history is still fresh, still continues even in many forms today?

What do you do when you realize that you are the elephant? 

David Creech is Assistant Professor of Religion at Concordia College in Moorhead, Minnesota. Before taking his teaching post up on the frozen tundra he worked for four years doing anti-hunger education and mobilization with ELCA World Hunger. When he is not herding cats (i.e., spending quality time with his three kids) he posts profound thoughts on Twitter @dyingsparrows.

You can follow On Pop Theology on Twitter @OnPopTheology or like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/OnPopTheology. If you'd like to support what we do here, you can donate via the button on the right of the screen.

You might also like:  

Thursday, March 13, 2014

If God Had a Name

by Sebastian Faust 

God said to Moses, “Speak thus to the people of Israel, ‘Yahweh, the god of your ancestors, the god of Abraham, the god of Isaac, and the god of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and this is my memorial from generation to generation.”– Exodus 3:15 


If God had a name, what would it be? And would you call it to his face if you were faced with him in all of his glory? – Joan Osborne, One of Us



In the land where I am from
we worshipped the nameless God. 
We built shrines to honor
and sang songs to praise
the God who had no name, no face, no form.
With fear and with trembling,
with heads bowed low and eyes cast down,
with reverence and awe
we approached our unnamed God.


In the land where I am from, we had names for many things. There was a name for the summer that lingers late into fall, a name for the time between sunset and darkness. Each of my brothers had names, and each of my sisters, and each of the animals we tended. But my God was a nameless god.

I cannot speak for the others of my tribe; I speak only for myself:
I was never able to love
a god I could not name.



In the land where I am from,
when we have no name for a thing,
we call it “thing.”
When I have no name for a god,
I call it “God.”

And so I did.
We all did, in the land where I am from.


Only when I left the land of modernity, when I began to read the ancient texts with ancient eyes, did I meet my God again. But this time, my God spoke his name. Like learning another tribe’s constellations—the same stars but in different shapes—there was a god who walked a beautiful garden in the breeze of the day, and he called himself Yahweh.

This, too, was the god who ate with Abraham beneath the shade of a tree, who spoke with Moses face to face, who was seen by the elders of Israel—they met him upon a mountain, and they rejoiced to look upon him as a table was spread with food. And the god who walked, who spoke, who ate, this god had a name, and it was Yahweh.

But what’s in a name? I cannot say, exactly. I can only tell you that when my nameless God took up his name, a hundred locked doors were suddenly flung open before me. Suddenly, there was something here, someone here, with whom I could interact, with whom I could communicate. When God took a name, there was identity, there was substance, there was being. And the world began to shift, swiftly tilting, moving from the vocabulary of concept and of title into the realm of relationship and affinity.

I had never been able to love God, but Yahweh I can love. It was presumptuous for me, a mere human, to lift my eyes up to God, but I do not fear to seek Yahweh’s face. And there could be no wrestling; no doubting was tolerable with God, but Yahweh asks me to lay myself bare and hears my laments. Yahweh can empathize with me, and I with him… something I had never found possible with God.

When my nameless God took up his name, a hundred new worlds unfolded around me, a hundred new stars bloomed in the night. I stood still, and he passed before me, and he spoke his name aloud.

To speak one’s name is to dispense with titles and to lay aside formality; it is an invitation to become intimates. Yahweh speaks his name that we may begin to know him as we would know one another. He speaks it because he longs for relationship, as messy and as complicated as that may be. Yahweh speaks his name in order to reveal his personality, inviting us in to his interior self.

When Moses stood in the cloven rock, Yahweh passed before him and proclaimed his name aloud. It is a declaration of his personality, of what he means when he says “I.” He proclaimed, "Yahweh, Yahweh, gracious and compassionate, slow to anger, abounding in kindness and faithfulness, showing kindness to the thousandth generation, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin, but who will not leave the merciless unpunished." - Exodus 34:6-7 

What’s in a name? I do not know. But for one such as me, it has made all the difference.
For a larger conversation about God in Exodus, check out the interview Sebastian recorded with Old Testament scholar Terence Fretheim here.

Sebastian Faust makes no claims to the throne and has no designs on small, undefended countries. He takes life by the reins, bulls by the horns, tigers by the tail, and lives a life rather ordinary in Nashville, Tennessee. He currently holds the position of Dauphin at On Pop Theology. You can’t follow Sebastian on Twitter because he doesn’t understand technology, but he appreciates hand-written notes sent by post or well-mannered carrier pigeon.
 


You can follow On Pop Theology on Twitter @OnPopTheology or like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/OnPopTheology. If you'd like to support what we do, you can donate via the button on the right of the screen.

Image Credits:
Image #1 via Sebastian Faust
Image #2 via Eensteen
Image #3 via Tom Paton   
  
You might also like:  

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Bad Music Theology: "Dark Horse" by Katy Perry (feat. Juicy J)

by Ben Howard

Every so often I come across a pop song so catchy that I can't stop listening to it, but with lyrics so terrible that I hate myself every time I press play. Such is the case with "Dark Horse" by Katy Perry and Juicy J.

Since I can't seem to stop listening to this bizarre song, I've decided to do the next best thing: wildly re-interpret it using theological language that has almost no connection to the intended reality of the song. Follow me as we over-interpret, under-interpret, make associations based on the most tangential of evidence and generally wreck Holy Havoc on this pop music phenomena.

This is Bad Music Theology. 

(If you must, you can listen to the song here, but I wouldn't.)

[Juicy J:]
Yeah
Ya'll know what it is
Katy Perry
Juicy J, aha.
Let's rage


All good pop-music based theology deserves a proper hype-man. Here Juicy J provides us with an introduction to the deity known as Katy Perry. Juicy J performs his role as a kind of Moses-figure bridging the divide between the untouchable, and possibly dangerous deity, and we the people who will follow her. Let us rage.

[Katy Perry:]
I knew you were
You were gonna come to me
And here you are
But you better choose carefully
‘Cause I, I’m capable of anything
Of anything and everything


The Deity Known As Katy Perry enters the scene. She reinforces the inevitability that we would come to her, that she knew we would come to seek her out. However, she is careful to warn us that we should be careful about making a covenant with her as she is all powerful and “capable of anything/Of anything and everything”. In historical terms, this may be a reference to the Israelites fleeing Egypt and encountering God on Mt. Sinai. These final lines must then be read as allusions to the plagues which had been brought down upon Egypt. Capable of anything indeed.

Make me your Aphrodite
Make me your one and only
But don’t make me your enemy, your enemy, your enemy


The Second Commandment of The Deity Known As Katy Perry: “You shall not make for yourself a pop star, or any likeness of a pop star that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or listen to them, for I the Katy Perry your Deity am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who did not buy my record, but showing steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and attend my concerts.”

So you wanna play with magic
Boy, you should know what you're falling for
Baby do you dare to do this?
Cause I’m coming at you like a dark horse
Are you ready for, ready for
A perfect storm, perfect storm
Cause once you’re mine, once you’re mine
There’s no going back


The Deity (Known As Katy Perry) lays out her ultimatum for the pseudo-Israelites of this song. If they want to play with “magic,” then they must be aware of what they are committing themselves to. They must count the cost and decide whether they dare to accept the offer, for if they back out, the God Katy Perry will come at them like a dark horse, obviously an allusion to the curses at the end of the covenant. (Disease, death, captivity, the barren fields, etc.)

The Katy Perry, thy God, descends upon Sinai in a perfect storm... and it really is perfect. Lightning crashes down, fire pours down the slopes, earthquakes shake the foot of the mountain.

Only one question remains: Are they ready for a perfect storm? For there is no going back.

Mark my words
This love will make you levitate
Like a bird
Like a bird without a cage
But down to earth
If you choose to walk away, don’t walk away


God also promises her people that if they commit to her, she will “make [them] levitate/like a bird/like a bird without a cage.” She shall bear them on the wings of eagles. However, if they choose to abandon her loving embrace, well... they really should know better than to make such a cataclysmic decision.

It’s in the palm of your hand now baby
It’s a yes or no, no maybe
So just be sure before you give it all to me
All to me, give it all to me


It is up the people, only they can choose whether or not they will follow God/Katy Perry. They must be certain of their choice though, because the consequences of giving less than 100% could be dire. There is no maybe.

So you wanna play with magic
Boy, you should know what you're falling for
Baby do you dare to do this?
Cause I’m coming at you like a dark horse
Are you ready for, ready for
A perfect storm, perfect storm
Cause once you’re mine, once you’re mine (love trippin')
There’s no going back


The Deity Known As Katy Perry once again reinforces her power and might. She repeats the offer for the people. If they wish to be blessed by her deified self and “play with magic” then they should be aware of what they are in for. Once again they are told that “there is no going back.” This is the Sinai moment for the quasi-Israelites.

[Juicy J - Rap Verse]
Uh
She’s a beast
I call her Karma (come back)
She eats your heart out
Like Jeffrey Dahmer (woo)
Be careful
Try not to lead her on
Shorty’s heart is on steroids
Cause her love is so strong


It is at this crucial moment in time that Juicy J enters the frame as one part Greek Chorus and one part Mosaic leader. He reasserts the power and danger of the deity in question, but also notes the upside of committing to her since “Shorty’s heart is on steroids/Cause her love is so strong.”

You may fall in love
When you meet her
If you get the chance you better keep her
She's sweet as pie but if you break her heart
She'll turn cold as a freezer
That fairy tale ending with a knight in shining armor
She can be my Sleeping Beauty
I’m gon’ put her in a coma


Once again The Juicy One reasserts the conflation of awe-some power, might, and danger with the wonder and majesty of God/Katy Perry. He says that the people may not even have a choice for they may “fall in love/When [they] meet her.” Yet there is always the possibility that “She’ll turn cold as a freezer.” Scholars are split on the final lines of Mr. J, some seeing it as a fairytale ending and others viewing as a subversion of the patriarchal fairytale form.

Woo!
Damn I think I love her
Shorty so bad, I’m sprung and I don’t care
She ride me like a roller coaster
Turned the bedroom into a fair (a fair!)
Her love is like a drug
I was tryna hit it and quit it
But lil' mama so dope
I messed around and got addicted


The highly sexualized imagery used by Juicy J in reference to God is used to highlight the intimacy and union of the people with The Deity Known As Katy Perry. Moses/Juicy also warns the people from trying to use God for temporary reasons since he had once entered the relationship thinking the same. He too was “tryna hit it and quit it/But lil’ mama so dope/I messed around and got addicted.”

So you wanna play with magic
Boy, you should know what you're falling for (you should know)
Baby do you dare to do this?
Cause I’m coming at you like a dark horse (like a dark horse)
Are you ready for, ready for (ready for)
A perfect storm, perfect storm (a perfect storm)
Cause once you’re mine, once you’re mine (mine)
There’s no going back


The Deity Known As Katy Perry once more repeats her offering to the people along with her warning. Do they want to play with magic? Do they know what they’re falling for? Once the people have made their choice, there is no going back.

Baby do you dare to do this?

Ben Howard is an accidental iconoclast and generally curious individual living in Nashville, Tennessee. He is also the editor-in-chief of On Pop Theology and an avid fan of waving at strangers for no reason. You can follow him on Twitter @BenHoward87. 

You can follow On Pop Theology on Twitter @OnPopTheology or like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/OnPopTheology. If you'd like to support what we do, you can donate via the button on the right of the screen.

Image Credits:
Image #1 via Liam Mendes
Image #2 via Wikipedia
Image #3 via oouinouin
Image #4 via James West
  
You might also like: