Peace,
Ben
----------------------
by Anonymous
For
the unindoctrinated, the TV show Firefly and the subsequent film,
Serenity, follow Captain Malcom Reynolds (pictured) and his crew in a
Wild West-esque future. The story takes place across multiple worlds
as the crew of the ship Serenity pirates around a solar system
occupied by humans after the “Earth-That-Was” could no longer
support its population.
Another note for the unindoctrinated, stop being dumb and go watch every disc right now and don’t talk to me again until you do! angry sound effects
For the rest of you, “Hello and welcome. Please continue.”
Captain Malcom Reynolds goes by “Mal,” which is, as series discusses, the root word of the Latin “malum” and “malus,” meaning ill, bad, harmful, evil, and wicked, as well as “maleficium,” meaning wrong-doing, harm, injury and mischief. It is also made clear throughout the series that Mal doesn’t believe in god, or more accurately, he doesn’t believe anymore.
With those facts in mind, someone who hasn’t seen the series (Which is no one, right? I thought I was very clear back there) would conclude Mal is an interplanetary Jesse James. In fact, Mal is closer to an unintentional vigilante. A measured, moral, dashing vigilante.
To be fair (read: to avoid angry, counter arguments), Mal commits his share of immoral acts. He fights. He steals. He even kills, though usually not as a first option.
But the core of the character is good. He acts, often at his own peril, in the interest of his crew, his friends, strangers in need, and the human race as a whole. A few proof points:
Another note for the unindoctrinated, stop being dumb and go watch every disc right now and don’t talk to me again until you do! angry sound effects
For the rest of you, “Hello and welcome. Please continue.”
Captain Malcom Reynolds goes by “Mal,” which is, as series discusses, the root word of the Latin “malum” and “malus,” meaning ill, bad, harmful, evil, and wicked, as well as “maleficium,” meaning wrong-doing, harm, injury and mischief. It is also made clear throughout the series that Mal doesn’t believe in god, or more accurately, he doesn’t believe anymore.
With those facts in mind, someone who hasn’t seen the series (Which is no one, right? I thought I was very clear back there) would conclude Mal is an interplanetary Jesse James. In fact, Mal is closer to an unintentional vigilante. A measured, moral, dashing vigilante.
To be fair (read: to avoid angry, counter arguments), Mal commits his share of immoral acts. He fights. He steals. He even kills, though usually not as a first option.
But the core of the character is good. He acts, often at his own peril, in the interest of his crew, his friends, strangers in need, and the human race as a whole. A few proof points:
- He steals a shipment heading to an outpost on a border world, but when he discovers the contractor who gave him the job didn’t tell him everything, namely that the shipment is medicine and the outpost will be in dire straits without it, he returns it to local officials and accepts the wrath of the sadistic contractor.
- Years before the TV episodes and movie take place, Mal volunteers for the Independentce army which fights to stay separate from Alliance governance. He does this because of his belief in the peoples right to live their lives freely and not be subject to the will of others’ ideals.
- He refuses to kill a man in a dual that was forced upon him stating, “Mercy is the mark of a great man.” (Of course, Mal then gives the other man two small, nonfatal stabs and acknowledges maybe he’s just, “Alright.”)
- Most notably, (Spoiler Alert: This is the entire plot of the movie Serenity.) he goes to extreme lengths to broadcast a video that reveals the heinous outcome of a underhanded attempted by the Alliance to control an entire world through forced medication. Mal is willing to sacrifice his life in order to right a wrong decades past.
He
operates without a God-pointing moral compass, yet has a steadfast
moral code that can be summarized as: Love and protect those who
earn it and need it, no matter the cost. For everyone else, an equal
and opposite reaction to their evil action.
Mal
is good without God. No, he doesn’t turn his cheek. He doesn’t
spoon out soup to the homeless. He sure as hell isn’t meek. And
he does have his shortcomings, which he recognizes, but he preserves
his freedom, and that of his crew, and navigates lawless worlds
without leaving a swath of destruction and, in most cases, leaves
things slightly better.
Who could ask for more? Isn’t that every good person’s aim? Deal the best you can with the world around you, leave it better than you found it, all while making those around you happier.
Who could ask for more? Isn’t that every good person’s aim? Deal the best you can with the world around you, leave it better than you found it, all while making those around you happier.
Mal
is an example of the current atheist rallying cry, “Good without
God.” The series also gives many examples of people who are bad
without Satan— mal sine diabolus—as well as good with God and bad
with God.
“Good
without God” is a plea for people to see that the guidance of a
deity isn’t required for good behavior. In my experience—and I
imagine yours, if you’re honest—the moral atheist (or at least,
nonreligious)/bad atheist ratio is the same as the moral
religious/bad religious ratio.
Atheists
are viewed by many (dare I say, most) people as bad. Perhaps not
always out loud, but as a gut feeling. The most commonly expressed
thought is: Atheists don’t believe in God so they can act as they
wish.
However, almost universally, atheists view their non-belief in God separate from their views on appropriate behavior.
However, almost universally, atheists view their non-belief in God separate from their views on appropriate behavior.
This
atheist finds deep serenity in the fact that there is a sense of
morality separate of religion. It doesn’t take knowledge of a God
in order for a person to know good from bad. People across the
Earth-That-Is, regardless of their experience know to protect those
who have earned it and need it and correct those who don’t.
Like
Mal, I think it is vital to see people for who and what they are—and
what they are is conveyed by what they do. He deals with priests,
high society, and outlaws and holds them to the same standard. What
they believe or the moral code they claim to subscribe to holds no
bearing on the actual world, so it is of no consequence to him or
anything else.
What is of consequence is how they, and you, change the world.
What is of consequence is how they, and you, change the world.
(Unlike
Mal, I am not so confident in my relationships and surroundings, so I
will sign this post…)
- Anonymous Atheist
- Anonymous Atheist
