 |
| Best. Pope. Ever. |
by Ben Howard
In honor of the NBA’s trade deadline, I bring you three anachronistic
theology trades I’d like to see.
TRADE #1
Gregory the Great, 2
bishops (not Augustine of Canterbury), and the 1st pick of the 605
A.D. Priest Draft (there should totally be a Priest Draft, if only for the
outfits) for N.T. Wright
What the 6th
Century Gets: A great theologian who can help a relatively young church to
understand Paul and Judaism. Perhaps this understanding will be able to derail
some of the anti-Semitic sentiment that built up in Europe during this time and
in the long-run even may lead to the prevention of the Holocaust. That would be
an MVP level performance by itself, but Wright also brings the ability to help
a society understand the concepts of the afterlife and the sacraments before they
completely devolve into mythologized legend.
What the 21st
Century Gets: One of the greatest popes of all time to fill a clear hole on
the team, as well one of the great pastoral thinkers. I love Gregory the Great
(I wrote my undergrad thesis on him), so I may be overrating him a bit, but let
me tell you his story. Gregory was a wealthy young Roman who inherited his
Father’s estate as a young man. Instead of living a life of luxury he gave away
all the families money, turned the family home into a convent and became a
monk. Eventually, he would become a hero in the city through his work during an
epidemic of disease. When the disease in question brought about the death of
the reigning pope, Gregory was elected by popular acclaim. As a rather humble
man, Gregory attempted to have his election invalidated by the Emperor in
Constantinople, who refused his request. Also, we’re getting two awesome
bishops, and a pretty good draft pick. I think this trade is a win-win.
TRADE #2
Mark Driscoll, the
Gospel Coalition and theory of Intelligent Design for Julian of Norwich and
Margery Kempe
 |
"All shall be well and all shall be well
and all manner of things shall be well." |
What the 14th
Century Gets: I think it’s pretty clear that Driscoll, the Gospel Coalition
and the theory of Intelligent Design all need a change of scenery and what
better place than the Dark Ages. Okay, okay, settle down, this isn’t as
insulting as it sounds. Driscoll and the neo-Calvinists of the Gospel Coalition
would look absolutely loving and revolutionary in the context of the 14th
century church. Additionally, the deep patriarchy of the time would cloak some
of their more evident flaws. The flaws would still exist, but they wouldn’t be
the focus of so much attention. Same for intelligent design, removed from the
scientific era in which it was birthed, intelligent design might be an
excellent way to bridge the coming divide between science and the church,
perhaps even clearing the way for a church that can accept evolution for the
actual science that it is.
What the 21st
Century Gets: Two of the most underrated mystic theologians of all-time,
and powerful female mystic theologians to boot. If you know me even a little,
it’s no secret that Julian is one of my favorite theologians. Seriously, go buy
a copy of Revelations of Divine Love right now! Mysticism has
made a bit of return of late and I think these two thinkers would do a lot to
direct that conversation down the paths it needs to go. Also, it might be interesting
to challenge the theological status quo with a woman who has ecstatic visions
of Christ. That doesn’t fit real well into an intellectually elite mindset. I’m
excited.
TRADE #3
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
and H. Richard Niebuhr for Shane Claiborne, Peter Rollins and Stanley Hauerwas
What the 21st
Century Gets: Two great theologians who were victims of their times.
Bonhoeffer’s life was cut short after it was discovered that he was involved in
a plot to assassinate Hitler. James McClendon explores the ethical dilemma of
Bonhoeffer’s involvement in the assassination plot in depth in his book Ethics, but that isn’t even the point I
want to make. Bonhoeffer was only 39 years old when he died and much of his
theology was crafted in the turmoil of war. What would Bonhoeffer have been
able to do with 40 more years of writing? What beauty did we miss out on?
Niebuhr is similar, yet altogether different. His magnum
opus, Christ and Culture, was written
in the wake of World War II and belies the anger and cynicism of the time.
Niebuhr is obviously a fantastic theologian, but one wonders what he could have
written had he lived in a time that viewed World War II as past and not present.
 |
| Peter Rollins |
What the 20th
Century Gets: Pacifists in the United States and a thoughtful,
philosophical creative conflict resolver in Northern Ireland. Additionally, all
of these people understand the mechanisms of power that influence politics more
than the single intentions of one man. So what happens when you place some of
the most creative non-violent minds of the modern age into the fire of the
greatest example of why non-violence wouldn’t work? I honestly don’t know, but
I’d be very intrigued to find out.
I know I write a lot of weird things, sometime for a point
and sometimes just for the sake of weirdness. This one has a point. I think it’s
important for us to realize how much our context shapes who we are, who we
become, what we think about, the problems we attempt to solve, and what we view
as important. What happens if Julian of Norwich is located in the United States
of today? Does she become Rachel Held Evans? Does she become a pastor at a
church plant in Portland? Does she become irrelevant entirely?
Who would I be if I lived during WWII? Or during the 14th
century? Or in the future? I’m not certain.
What are your thoughts on this weird little thought
experiment? Helpful? Useless? Any trades you’d want to see?
Peace,
Ben
Contact us at onpoptheology [at] gmail.com.
by Ben Howard 
